9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (1) TMI 1005 - AT - Income TaxTDS u/s 195 - disallowance u/s. 40(a)(i) for non deduction of TDS on payment to non-resident which is in nature of FTS(Fee for Technical Service) - beneficial provisions of India-Netherland DTAA - Scope of services the AO held that the nature of services contemplated under the Agreement was that of advisory and consultancy services which would be covered within the meaning of 'fee for technical services' ( FTS ) both under the Income Tax Act as well as the treaty - CIT(A) deleted addition - HELD THAT - CIT(A) held that the amount received by NTL Lemnis Holding BV for management and sales marketing support services as non-taxable in view of the beneficial provisions of India-Netherland tax treaty read with the MFN clause and the India Netherland treaty. It has also been submitted that since the subject matter income has been assessed to be non-taxable in the hands of the recipient, there is no question of deducting tax at source under section 195 by the remitter and disallowance under section 40(a)(i). Having heard the arguments of the ld. DR and the material on record, we hold that the MFN clause of India-Neitherland Tax Treaty has been rightly interpreted by the ld. CIT(A) and hence, we decline to interfere with order of the ld. CIT(A). Appeal of the Revenue is dismissed.
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of Rs. 6,74,32,200/- under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS on payment to non-resident categorized as Fee for Technical Services (FTS). Summary: Issue 1: Disallowance under Section 40(a)(i) for Non-Deduction of TDS on FTS Payment The Revenue questioned whether the CIT(A) erred in deleting the disallowance of Rs. 6,74,32,200/- under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS on payment to a non-resident, which was deemed as Fee for Technical Services (FTS). The assessee, engaged in the business of import/export, trading, manufacturing, and consulting in lighting products, paid management fees to NTL Lemnis Holding BV, a tax resident of the Netherlands, under a management agreement. The Assessing Officer (AO) held that the nature of services provided under the agreement were advisory and consultancy services, falling under FTS as per the Income Tax Act and the India-Netherlands tax treaty. Consequently, the AO disallowed the deduction of Rs. 6,74,32,200/- under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS on these payments. The assessee argued that the services were administrative and managerial, not technical, and did not meet the "make available" clause under the India-Netherlands DTAA. They contended that the payments were not taxable in India, thus no TDS was required under section 195. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's argument, noting that the services did not impart technical knowledge or skills to the assessee, and hence, were not FTS. The CIT(A) also considered the assessment order of the DCIT, International Taxation, Noida, which concluded that the income received by NTL Lemnis Holding BV was non-taxable in India. The CIT(A) ruled that since the income was non-taxable in the hands of the recipient, the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) for non-deduction of TDS was unwarranted. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal, which upheld the CIT(A)'s interpretation of the MFN clause in the India-Netherlands Tax Treaty. The Tribunal agreed that the services provided did not qualify as FTS and thus were not subject to TDS under section 195. Consequently, the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was rightly deleted. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 22/01/2024.
|
