9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (1) TMI 1075 - AT - Income TaxTDS u/s 195 - addition u/s 40(a)(i) - sales commission expenses paid to agents outside India for non-deduction of tax at source - HELD THAT - We find that the assessee had sufficiently demonstrated that services rendered by the foreign agents were all outside India for procuring the sale orders for the assessee with the agreement clearly pointing out that foreign agents required to procure sales from the respective territories outside India for the assessee. Certificates furnished by these agents demonstrated that they had no place of business in India and invoices of exports, as also invoices raised by the commission agents sufficiently proved that they had paid commission for the export orders procured by them for the assessee. Thus, all the documentary evidences, placed before us and noted by us, have been sufficiently proved, we hold that the agents were remunerated by way of commission for procuring sale orders for the assessee outside India; that there is no evidence on record to show that any services by these agents was rendered in India. As considering in the case of Toshoku Ltd. 1980 (8) TMI 2 - SUPREME COURT commission income earned by such agents cannot be termed to have incurred or arisen in India, and therefore, was not taxable in India - there was no liability on the assessee to deduct any TDS of such commission income. The disallowances therefore made are uncalled for - Decided in favour of assessee.
Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of sales commission expenses paid to agents outside India for non-deduction of tax at source under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Summary of Judgment: Issue: Disallowance of Sales Commission Expenses for Non-Deduction of Tax at Source The appeals were filed by the assessee against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) pertaining to Assessment Years 2012-13 to 2014-15 and 2017-18. The common issue in all appeals was the disallowance of sales commission expenses paid to foreign agents for non-deduction of tax at source under section 40(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The assessee, engaged in the manufacturing and export of textile fabrics/fibre, yarn, and other items, made payments of commission to non-residents without deducting TDS. The amounts paid varied across the years, with significant sums disallowed by the AO and CIT(A) due to non-compliance with TDS provisions. The CIT(A) confirmed the disallowance, noting that the assessee failed to prove that the commission was for services rendered outside India. The CIT(A) emphasized the lack of documentary evidence demonstrating the foreign agents' services and their taxability in their respective countries. The CIT(A) held that the assessee did not provide sufficient details such as agreements, bank advice, and income tax returns of the foreign agents to substantiate their claim. During the appellate proceedings, the assessee argued that the commission paid to foreign agents was for services rendered outside India, supported by agreements, invoices, and certificates from Chartered Accountants. The assessee referenced the Hon'ble Supreme Court's decision in CIT Vs. Toshoku Ltd., which established that commission for services rendered outside India cannot be deemed to have accrued or arisen in India. The Tribunal reviewed the documentary evidence submitted by the assessee, including agreements with foreign agents, invoices, and certificates confirming no business connection in India. The Tribunal found that the assessee had sufficiently demonstrated that the services were rendered outside India, and thus, the commission income was not taxable in India. Applying the legal principles from the Toshoku Ltd. case, the Tribunal concluded that there was no liability on the assessee to deduct TDS on such commission payments. Consequently, the disallowances made under section 40(a)(i) were deemed uncalled for and directed to be deleted. All the appeals of the assessee were allowed, and the order was pronounced in the Court on 24th January, 2024, at Ahmedabad.
|
