2024 (1) TMI 1241 - SC - Income Tax

Validity of Judgement of High Court - While admitting the appeal of the Revenue, the HC 2008 (9) TMI 1035 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT has framed 10 question of laws - However, while disposing the appeal, the High Court 2015 (12) TMI 1896 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT observed that, no substantial question of law arises out of the judgment rendered by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. HELD THAT - A combined reading of the above referred orders is sufficient to explain the reason for setting aside the judgment of the High Court. There is no option except to set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court and remand the matter to High Court for hearing the appeal. Accordingly, we allow this appeal, set aside the impugned judgment of the High Court and restore the appeal on the record of the High Court. High Court shall now hear both the parties and decide the case on merits.

Issues Involved:
The appeal against the judgment of the High Court dated 22.12.2015, where the High Court dismissed the Income Tax Appeal No. 683 of 2008 preferred by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Kol-III, Kolkata against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal.

Interest for Preoperative Period:
The High Court admitted the appeal and formulated questions of law regarding the correctness of allowing interest for the preoperative period as revenue expenditure, contrary to previous decisions. The questions raised pertained to the Income Tax Act, 1961, and specific case law references.

Deferred Revenue Expenditure:
Another issue raised was the correctness of allowing deferred revenue expenditure relating to the sponsorship of an event in the next year, which was not claimed in the current year's accounts but was allowed in the subsequent year. The Tribunal's decision on this matter was questioned.

Disallowance of Donations:
The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision to allow donations to staff welfare associations, which were considered inadmissible under a specific section of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was also challenged in the appeal.

Disallowed Travelling Expenses:
A dispute arose regarding the deletion of disallowance of a portion of travelling expenses, where certain expenses could not be proven to be for the business purpose of the assessee, and full details were not furnished. The Tribunal's decision on this matter was under scrutiny.

Provision for Damaged Stock:
The correctness of allowing a provision in respect of damaged stock, specifically cigarettes, was questioned. The Tribunal's decision to allow this provision was a subject of contention in the appeal.

Interest on Interest-Free Advances:
The deletion of disallowance of a significant amount as proportionate interest related to interest-free advances to subsidiaries was disputed. The Tribunal's decision in this regard was challenged in the appeal.

Treatment of Capital Gains:
A question was raised on the treatment of capital gains pertaining to land, whether they should be considered as long-term capital gains or short-term capital gains. The Tribunal's direction on this issue was under review.

Excess Price Paid for Purchase:
The correctness of deleting disallowance under a specific section of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for excess price paid for the purchase of tobacco from subsidiaries at rates higher than the market price was contested. The Tribunal's decision in this regard was a point of contention in the appeal.

Deduction under Section 80HHD:
The correctness of directing the allowance of deduction under a particular section of the Income Tax Act, 1961, with reference to specific criteria instead of proportionate foreign exchange earnings was disputed. The Tribunal's decision on this deduction was challenged in the appeal.

Calculation of Interest Payable:
An issue was raised regarding the calculation of interest payable under a specific section of the Income Tax Act, 1961, concerning the deduction of self-assessment tax paid from the tax payable as per the assessment order. The Tribunal's decision on this matter was under scrutiny in the appeal.

Judgment Outcome:
Upon final hearing, the High Court simply dismissed the appeal without finding any substantial question of law arising from the Tribunal's judgment. The Supreme Court set aside the High Court's judgment and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing, directing the High Court to decide the case on its merits after hearing both parties. Any pending applications were disposed of accordingly.

← Previous Next →