9911796707
|
Home
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (3) TMI 632 - HC - GSTDismissal of an appeal due to the non-submission of a certified copy of the impugned order within the prescribed time frame. - Direction to appellate authority to de novo hear the appeal filed by the petitioner and pass a reasoned order on merits within a period of three months - HELD THAT - Upon reconsideration of the order passed, this Court, suo motu, is of the view that paragraph 4 of the judgment and order dated February 12, 2024 2024 (2) TMI 718 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT is required to be substituted. Accordingly, paragraphs 4, 4(i) and 4(ii) of this order be read in place of paragraph 4 of the judgment and order dated February 12, 2024 and this order be treated as part and partial of the said judgment and order. The Registrar Compliance of this Court is directed to communicate this order to the parties.
Issues involved:
The judgment addresses the issue of non-submission of certified copy in appeals filed electronically under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Rule 108 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017, leading to dismissal of appeals solely on the ground of technical defect. The judgment, delivered by Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf, J., pertains to a writ petition where the impugned order dated October 18, 2023, was set aside, and the appellate authority was directed to re-hear the appeal filed by the petitioner within three months. Upon reconsideration, the Court replaced paragraph 4 of the original judgment with new paragraphs citing precedents from the Orissa High Court and the High Court of Madras. These precedents emphasized that non-submission of a certified copy of the impugned order within the stipulated time is a technical defect and should not lead to the dismissal of appeals. The Court highlighted that the requirement to furnish a certified copy within a specified period is procedural and can be condoned under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. It was concluded that dismissing appeals solely for not filing the certified copy within seven days is unwarranted when the appeal itself was filed electronically within the prescribed timeframe. The order directed the Registrar Compliance of the Court to communicate the revised decision to the concerned parties for implementation.
|
