Home Case Index All Cases Service Tax Service Tax + AT Service Tax - 2024 (3) TMI AT This
Forgot password New User/ Regiser ⇒ Register to get Live Demo
2024 (3) TMI 857 - AT - Service TaxFailure to pay appropriate tax - Revenue from Programme and Advertising Service - quantum of service tax paid by them was not commensurate with the income accounted in the books of accounts - demand alongwith penalty - HELD THAT - The dispute arose due to the lack of submission of data in a timely manner and a proper explanation of facts in correlation with the law, by the Appellant. Now that the Appellant is ready to present the data which as per their calculation leaves a very small amount of duty to be paid, it would serve the ends of justice if the same is verified and then examined in connection with the law and Boards Circulars referred to by the Appellant. The matter hence merits to be examined afresh. The impugned order set aside - matter remanded back to the original authority for de novo adjudication - appeal disposed off.
Issues Involved:
The issues involved in the judgment are related to the non-payment of appropriate service tax on advertising services, failure to register and pay service tax for other taxable services, discrepancy in service tax payments, imposition of penalties under various sections of the Finance Act, 1994, and the proper classification of services provided by the appellant. Details of the Judgment: Non-Payment of Service Tax and Imposition of Penalties: The appellant, engaged in producing television programs and supervising production activities, was found to have not paid appropriate service tax on advertising services and other taxable services. The Department issued a Show Cause Notice demanding service tax under proviso to sec. 73(1) of the Finance Act, 1994. The adjudicating authority confirmed the demand and imposed penalties under sec. 77 and 78 of the Act. The appellant challenged this before the Tribunal. Contentions of the Appellant: The appellant contended that they had discharged service tax for the amounts received from TV channels for TV content production. They argued that the cost of print media should not be included for the levy of service tax, as they had already paid service tax with respect to the agency commission. The appellant provided a reconciliation statement to support their position. Revenue's Position: The Revenue argued that the taxable value adopted for service tax demand was correct during the disputed period, as the appellant failed to produce documentary evidence to the contrary. Tribunal's Decision: The Tribunal noted that the dispute arose due to the lack of timely submission of data and a proper explanation by the appellant. Considering the appellant's readiness to present data showing a minimal duty to be paid, the Tribunal decided to remand the matter back to the original authority for fresh adjudication. All issues were left open for re-examination. The lower authority was directed to follow the principles of natural justice and provide a reasonable opportunity for the appellant to present their case. The appellant was instructed to cooperate in the verification process within ninety days. Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for de novo adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of verifying the data presented by the appellant and examining it in connection with relevant laws and circulars. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
|