Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

Home Case Index All Cases Income Tax Income Tax + AT Income Tax - 2024 (11) TMI AT This

  • Login
  • Summary

Forgot password       New User/ Regiser

⇒ Register to get Live Demo



 

2024 (11) TMI 1064 - AT - Income Tax


Issues:
1. Incorrect selection of section code in application for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act.
2. Rejection of application by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) due to the wrong section code selected.
3. Jurisdiction of the Commissioner to condone the delay in filing the correct application.
4. Consideration of bonafide mistake by the assessee.
5. Extension of due date for filing Form 10A by the CBDT.
6. Decision on whether to condone the mistake and allow the assessee to apply under the correct section code.

Analysis:
The judgment pertains to an appeal against the rejection of an application for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act due to the assessee selecting the wrong section code. The assessee, a trust, had initially obtained registration under section 12A of the Act. Subsequently, when applying for regular registration under section 12AB, the assessee mistakenly chose the wrong code. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) rejected the application as infructuous and barred by limitation, leading to the appeal.

The learned Authorized Representative (AR) argued that the mistake was inadvertent and should be condoned, emphasizing that the assessee did not stand to gain from the error. On the other hand, the Departmental Representative (DR) contended that the Commissioner lacked the jurisdiction to condone the delay, especially considering the extended deadline for filing Form 10A by the CBDT. The DR also questioned the bonafides of the mistake, highlighting the delay in rectifying it.

Upon review, the Tribunal noted that the assessee had indeed erred in selecting the incorrect section code and failed to respond to notices regarding the mistake. The Tribunal acknowledged the extension of the due date for filing Form 10A by the CBDT, which the assessee had missed. However, considering the peculiar circumstances and the pending application, the Tribunal deemed it just to condone the mistake. It directed the Commissioner to allow the assessee to apply under the correct section code, Form 10A, thereby granting the appeal.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, emphasizing the condonation of the assessee's mistake in selecting the wrong section code. The judgment underscores the importance of procedural compliance in tax matters and the significance of timely rectification of errors to avoid adverse consequences.

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates