9911796707
TMI Blog2009 (7) TMI 614X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... use notice was issued to show cause as to why the registration certificate should not be cancelled for contravention of the provisions of the Central Excise Rules by not providing the required information as required by the Department for proper verification of the post facto registration and also by not maintaining and keeping the records in the premises The Original Authority suspended the Regis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ce the documents in support of their contention at the time of personal hearing. The appeal is allowed by way of remand. - E/821/2007-SM(BR) - 857/2009-SM(BR)(PB), - Dated:- 20-7-2009 - Shri P.K. Das, Member (J) Shri Iskitkhar Baig, SDR, for the Appellant. None, for the Respondent. [Order].- The relevant facts of the case, in brief, are that the respondents obtained Central Excise ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ell as clearance of the goods by issuing any invoices as required under Rule 11 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 till the suspension is revoked by any competent authority. The Commissioner (Appeals) set aside the suspension of the Registration Certificate. Hence, Revenue filed this appeal. 2. After hearing the ld. DR and on perusal of the records, the main contention of the Id. DR is that the r ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ust, 2006. It has been observed by the Commissioner (Appeals) that the alleged investigation proceedings initiated against the other units cannot be made ground for cancellation/suspension of the Central Excise Registration of the respondents just because the proprietor of the appellants is also the director/proprietor of the other units. 5. I find that the Original Authority suspended the Regis ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
