Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1988 (12) TMI 279

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 4 as a salesman was eligible for a Gold Dealers Licence. In rejecting the application, for licence the lower authority has relied upon the figures of turnover of last three years in order to invoke the provisions of Rule 2(0 of the Gold Control (Licensing of Dealers) Rules 1968. The figures of turnover of last three years relied upon in the above order did not disclose the continuous decline. 3. During the course of the personal hearing the Adv. drew my attention to the order No. 263/88/WRB, passed by CEGAT, Bombay, in the matter of Shantilal G. Jain v. Collector of Customs (Prev.), Bombay, reported in 1988 (17) ECR 389 and submitted that the identical question of law has been settled in the said Order. My attention was also drawn to th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... oyment. This view has also been taken by the South Regional Bench, Madras in the case of Collector of Central Excise v. Uttamchand Jain. Insofar as the turnover is concerned, there has been an appreciable decline in turnover between 1983 and 1984 and the case merits rejection under 2(f). 5. I first take up the issue of not making the application within 60 days of leaving such employment as stipulated in proviso (f) to Rule 2(f). The appellant had stated that he had made the application dated 26-8-1985 and appellant was working with M/s. Shree Harsha Jewellers, Bombay-77, from 1-1-1983 to 14-8-1985. This should prove that the appellant had made the application within 60 days of his employment. The Dy. Collector has not quoted any date i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... be seen that there is no fall in average turnover for dealer. In fact there has been rise. Since both these show cause notices have been issued by same authority I accept the one which is more favourable to the appellant for obvious reasons. The Appellate Tribunal in its order cited above has ruled that, the decline in turnover by itself should not be made a basis for non-issue of fresh licence . In this case, there is no decline in turnover but there is a substantial rise in the turnover. No minimum turnover of business in gold for town, city and district has been prescribed in the statute. 7. The Appellate Tribunal in its order in para 32 has observed as follows to explain the relevancy of the turnover of business in gold in the matt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ler in grams had also not fallen for the year 1985, even if it were otherwise construed against the appellant to deny the application for licence. 9. The powers under Section 27 of the Gold Control Act to issue licences are delegated by the Gold Control Administrator to the Officer of and above the rank of the Asstt. Collector. The powers to restrict or reduce the number of licensed dealers is vested with the Central Govt. under Section 27 (6A) of the Gold Control Act. If the Central Govt. is of the opinion that it is in public interest to reduce or restrict the number of licensed dealers, the direction to that effect should have been issued to the Gold Control Administrator. In the absence of any such directions, the officers, whom the p .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates