1994 (3) TMI 208

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (J)]. This is an appeal by the Revenue challenging the impugned orders passed by the authorities below whereby they allowed the refund claim of the respondents for the duty amounting to Rs. 9331.48. 2. Brief facts leading to the present appeal are that the respondents M/s. Mehta Vegetable Products (P) Ltd. are engaged in the manufacture of vegetable products at Chittorgarth. They preferred .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... or of Customs Central Excise, Indore, [1994 (69) E.L.T. 148 (Tri.)] (Para 5) wherein it was held as under : ****** 4. In reply, Shri J.S. Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondents, submitted that the respondent is a composite mill who manufacture and clear refined VNE Oil falling under Item 13 of the Central Excise Tariff and, therefore, the ratio of the said case of M/s. Rajadhiraj Indus .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... case of the present respondents (Order No. 481 to 482/89-C, dated 18-9-1989) on facts on the ground that the respondents mill was a composite mill in which crushing of oil seeds was also undertaken. For ready reference the relevant portion of the said Order may also be reproduced as under : 6. The learned counsel for the appellants has claimed that the matter had been settled in the appellant .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X