9911796707
TMI Blog1994 (10) TMI 138X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n 17-12-1987 however, since it was not a certified copy they had applied for the same and the said certified copy was received only on 11-10-1988. 4.The appellants subsequently filed the appeal before the Tribunal on 13-11-1988. 5.It was their submission that according to the CEGAT procedure rules and the preamble in the Order-in-Appeal an appeal was required to be filed along with certified copy of the impugned order. 6. Therefore, it was their belief that a certified copy had to be applied for and obtained and then only an appeal could be filed along with it. 7.It was their submission that they were guided by the preamble to Order-in-Appeal in this regard. 8. It was their contention that even otherwise the time taken in obtainin ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... er time for which they have not given a satisfactory explanation as in the absence of one assistant they could have arranged to take assistance of some other if so required the appeal and filed it. 12. We have considered the above submissions. We find that the appellants had initially filed an appeal memo under the cover of their letter dated 13-12-1988 which was received in the Tribunal on 5-12-1988. 13. In this memo in column 3 of form EA-3 relating to date of communication of a copy of the order appealed against, it is recorded as follows : (i) Date of receipt of order - 17-12-1987. (ii) Date on which application made for certified copy of the order - 29-9-1987. (iii) Date on which certified copy of the order received - 10-10- ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... al soon after the receipt of the certified copy but they did not do so and have not explained the reasons for taking more than three months for the purpose. 20. That their Excise Assistant had gone away on leave is no excuse because it was upto the appellant to make alternative arrangements and ensure filing of the appeal promptly. 21. It is also interesting to note that the appeal (with certified copy) was received in the Tribunal only on 5-12-1988 although it had already been verified on the 19th day of November which shows that it was ready for filing on 19th November but even then steps were not taken to file it immediately and the time gap between this date and the date of actual filing has also not been explained. Further it shows ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
