9911796707
TMI Blog1996 (9) TMI 404X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of Collector (Appeals), Indore, dated 9-11-1993. 2. Learned representative of the appellants stated that the Collector has erroneously dismissed their appeal on the ground of non-compliance with Section 35F as they had in view of their rejection of the stay application, paid the amount in question by making an appropriate entry in RG 23A Part II and had given intimation to the Collector (Appeals ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... filed the copy duly attested by the Supdt. 4. It was also their submission that in view of this fact, there was no need on their part for depositing any further amount. Furthermore, since it is already a settled issue, the matter may not be remanded to the Collector but may be decided on the basis of identical matters in which the Tribunal has already passed orders including the order in the ca ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... said Tribunal s order dated 30-11-1995/20-12-1995. 8. It is, therefore, their request that their appeal may be accepted and the amount already paid should be made available to them by reversal of the entry already made in view of the orders of the A.C. and the Collector. 9. Learned DR stated that he has seen the certified entry of 22-5-1993 in the RG 23A Part II duly signed by the Supdt. 10 ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... Therefore, he has no objection to the request of the appellants being granted. 11. I have considered the above submissions. I observe that in view of the deposit already made in terms of the Collector s order, no further deposit was called for and the appeal could be heard straightaway. I also observe that in view of the above submissions, the dispute has virtually ceased; And, in view of this ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
