1997 (3) TMI 177

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... .L. Bhat, President]. The common Order-in-Appeal Nos. 127 to 129/87 (Md), dated 30-9-1987 passed by the Collector (Appeals) Central Excise, Madras, is being challenged in these three appeals. The order passed by the Collector (Appeals) refers to three appeals against orders dated 22-1-1987, 3-2-1987 and 18-3-1987 passed by the Assistant Collector of Central Excise, Virudhunagar. However, it .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ional manufacturing profit of 10% has to be added to the assessable value. Notices were resisted by the Board. However, the Assistant Collector passed orders confirming the proposal. These orders have been confirmed by the Collector (Appeals). 3. Appellant is absent in spite of notice of hearing. We have heard Shri T.R. Malik, SDR and perused the papers. 4. It is stated in the memoranda of app .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... les and therefore notional profit should not be added to the assessable value. 6. Valuation of excisable goods captively consumed is governed by 6(b) of the Valuation Rules. The appellant has no contention that the assessable value should have been determined under sub-clause (i) of Rule 6(b) of the Rules. Assistant Collector has determined the value under clause (ii) of Rule 6(b) of the Rules. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X