1998 (4) TMI 281

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Srivastava, SDR, for the Respondent. [Order per : Justice U.L. Bhat, President]. Common order passed by the Collector (Appeals) dismissing the several appeals filed against the common order passed by the Assistant Collector on the basis of 7 show cause notices is challenged in the appeal. The appellant has filed an application under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944 seeking waiver .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ording to the appellant, there is no finding that sales were not genuine or the invoices were the result of manipulation. The Commissioner held that deduction of additional discount will be subject to actuals. This means that the additional discount will be deducted only for determining assessable value of goods purchased by the particular buyer. 3. The appellant relying on the decisions in Stal .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ed out that the present case is not a case of bulk buyers as in the case of Metal Box India Ltd. and the question in issue in the present case did not arise for consideration in the other case. 4. We are, prima facie of the opinion that the additional discount satisfies the requirements of Section 4(4)(d) of the Act and such discount is admissible whether or not all buyers availed the benefit th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X