1998 (6) TMI 287

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... (J)]. This is an appeal filed by the department against the impugned order dated 27-7-1989 passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Bombay. 2. The dispute is in respect of wiring harness. The classification of the product is not in dispute. Admittedly, the item was classifiable under Heading 85.44. Collector (Appeals) has classified this item alongwith the Horn to Earth Cable, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 1988 (34) E.L.T. 5 (S.C.) held that in the instant case, it is not disputed that what the appellant did was to cut the running length into short length fibre. It undoubtedly brought a change in the substance but did not bring into existence a new substance. Whether any change was brought in the substance has not been substantiated by the department. It was held by the Supreme Court in a number of .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X