2000 (5) TMI 894

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... [Order per : G.R. Sharma, Member (T)]. Arguing the case in respect of four applications for restoration of appeal Shri P.K. Sharma, ld. Counsel submits that in the case of these four applications the Tribunal had directed to deposit certain amounts. He submits that against the Tribunal Order the appellants filed writ petition before the concerned High Court. The High Court dismissed their w .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the appellants were given a particular date to deposit and on failure to deposit the amount by that particular date, the appeals were rightly dismissed for non-compliance of Section 35F of the Central Excise Act, 1944. He submits that since the amount directed to be deposited under the stay order was not deposited by the particular date, therefore the appellants should have deposited the amount ad .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X