9911796707
TMI Blog1995 (3) TMI 345X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... icates immediately and to pay compensation of Rs. 1,200. According to her, she applied for allotment of 100 equity shares of the first opposite party and paid a sum of Rs. 2,000. The registered folio number was 21,728 and the warrant number was 7,655. This information was given by the first opposite party to the complainant. But although the opposite parties sent dividend, no share certificates were issued to her, she, therefore, filed the complaint claiming reliefs mentioned above. 2. The opposite parties did not appear before the District Forum, but sent a counter. In the counter filed by the first opposite party apart from taking technical pleas about the maintainability of the complaint and territorial jurisdiction of the District F ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... nce, there is no deficiency of service on the part of the opposite parties. 3. Before the District Forum, the complainant filed Ex. A1 to A3. Ex. A is a letter dated 29-12-1992 sent by the opposite party No. 2 to the complainant. Evidently referring to her application for sending share certificates it was mentioned in the letter that her share certificates have been delivered to them on 5-10-1992 bearing distinctive Nos. 6172108, 6172207 for effecting transfer. The second opposite party kept the same in abeyance pending further clarification by the complainant. Ex. A2 is dividend warrant No. 7656 dated 17-8-1992 sent to the complainant towards Equity Dividend of 1992 in respect of the shares reference folio No. 21728. Ex. A3 is copy of ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... by the complain-ant. The counsel invited our attention to the share transfer application submitted by one Ravikanth Badruka, transferee for effecting the share to his distinctive Nos. 6172207, 6172108 with registered folio No. 21728 from Chandran, K.R. He also filed xerox copy of the refund order sent by the opposite parties to the complainant. These documents clinching by show that the complainant was not allotted shares of distinctive Nos. 6172108, 6172207 under registered folio No. 21728. On the other hand, the shares belonged to one Chandran, K.R. and subsequently on 24-8-1992 an application was filed for transfer of the shares in favour of Ravikanth Badruka. The complainant did not produce any evidence to show that the shares were allo ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
