9911796707
TMI Blog2000 (2) TMI 716X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e appellant under section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 ( the Act ), is directed against order dated 18-11-1999, passed by District Forum No. III in Complaint Case No. 204/1999-entitled Sh. Neeran Sawhney v. D.C.M. Ltd. 2. The facts, relevant for the disposal of the present appeal, lie in a narrow compass. The respondent Shri Neeran Sawhney had made deposit with the appellant und ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e Act, was not maintainable. 4. The learned District Forum, vide impugned order, has allowed the complaint of the respondent and has directed the appellant to pay back the amount in question to the respondent together with interest @ 15 per cent per annum. Feeling aggrieved, the appellant has preferred the present appeal. 5. We have heard the attorney of the appellant at length on the qu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... and the Hon ble High Court of Delhi, the complaint, filed by the respondent before the District Forum under section 12 of the Act, was not maintainable and the impugned order is liable to be quashed on the above grounds alone. 6. In so far as the plea, advanced by the learned counsel for the appellant regarding the order of the CLB, is concerned, the position is that in view of a recent decisi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ves in this Company petition and the same is accordingly disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to revive the petition in case there is any default in payment by the respondent. All pending C. As. are also accordingly disposed of." [ Emphasis supplied ] 7. As regards the above order of the Hon ble High Court the position is that in the first place it is nowhere stated t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
