9911796707
TMI Blog1999 (3) TMI 538X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mer Forum, Pauri Garhwal dated 9-12-1993. Briefly stated, the facts of the case are as follows : 2. The appellant, Shri R.K. Batra, filed a complaint against the Executive Engineer, UPSEB, Srinagar, Garhwal on 20-7-1993. The complaint was filed as Case No. 128 of 1993. The case was heard by President of the Forum Shri K.K. Agarwal and Member Smt. Meena Rawat. The complaint was heard and the ju ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... 93 but was not signed by Smt. Meena Rawat till 6-7-1993 and thereafter the Bench of the District Forum made a conspiracy and put the signature after 6-7-1993. Thus the Members were not entitled to get the wages for the above period and both the Members committed sin. The appellant has, therefore, prayed that the above order of the District Forum may be set aside and the case be handed over to CBI ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed that District Forum was not a proper Forum for filing such cases and the appellant could seek remedy by getting a writ issued in his favour or file a regular civil suit in the civil court and the complaint was not maintainable. 5. We have gone through the entire records placed on the file. Except for the appeal, affidavit and order dated 9-12-1993 of the District Forum, Pauri Garhwal, no ot ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... i Garhwal. Obviously, Shri R.K. Batra, the appellant did not seek any relief as a consumer. He has rather challenged the powers of the Members or the President of the District Forum and pointed out certain irregularities and illegalities. These aspects have also been dealt with sufficiently by the District Consumer Forum in their order dated 9-12-1993. Since the contents of the appeal are absolute ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
