2002 (4) TMI 774

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... aikh, DR, for the Respondent. [Order per : S.S. Sekhon, Member (T)]. This application is for modification of the Stay Order No. CI/3832/WZB/2001, dated 14-12-2001, by which the appellants were directed to make a pre-deposit of balance of duty of Rs. 5,07,948/- within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of that order. The appellant who was represented by the ld. Counsel, stat .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... question before us is, whether the duty demand, as confirmed, is as provided under law. When the Revenue has fairly admitted before us that the parameter taken by the Commissioner in fixing the ACP was not as per the Notification and was incorrect, we are of the view, that consequential demand pursuant to such fixation would, therefore, not be as provided under law. Therefore, we would set aside .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X