2002 (6) TMI 475

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nt. Shri S.C. Pushkarna, JDR, for the Respondent. [Order]. M/s. Rama Associates Ltd. have filed this Appeal being aggrieved with the Order-in-Appeal No. HKS (610) ICD/2001, dated 19-7-2001. 2. Ms. Sonia Mathur, learned Advocate, submitted that the Appellant Company is a recognized Trading House engaged in the export of rice and other agro commodities; that during the China Expo hel .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ns accompanying the goods must have made the Appellants aware of restrictive nature of the impugned goods which should have been imported under proper authorization from the Ministry of Telecommunication and that accordingly provisions of Section 111(d) of the Customs Act have been rightly invoked. The learned Advocate contended that on the import of the impugned goods, the provisions of Import - .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... . 3. Countering the arguments, Shri S.C. Pushkarna, learned Departmental Representative, reiterated the finding as contained in the impugned Order and emphasized that there is a restriction on the use of impugned phones by the Ministry of Communications and goods were thus prohibited goods. 4. I have considered the submissions of both the sides. I observe from the Invoice and Bill of Lading th .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X