2005 (2) TMI 699

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... per : V.K. Agrawal, Member (T)]. The issue involved in this appeal, filed by M/s. Shree Rajasthan Syntex Ltd., relates to refund of the Central Excise duty. 2. We heard Shri B.L. Narasimhan, learned Advocate for the appellants and Shri A.S. Bedi, learned S.D.R. for Revenue. 3. The appellants manufacture man-made yarn. They recovered freight and insurance charges from their customers on e .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... /- and has rejected the refund claim of remaining amount of Rs. 33,18,495/- on the ground of refund being hit by the time limit specified under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The only contention of the appellants is that the refund has arisen on account of the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Baroda Electric Meters Ltd. (supra) and, therefore, the computation of the time limit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... rt in the case of Baroda Electric Meters Ltd. (supra). There is no force in their submissions that the time limit will be computed from the time the judgment was pronounced by the Supreme Court as there is no such provision in Section 11B of the Act. It has been held by the Supreme Court in the case of Miles India Ltd. v. Assistant Collector of Customs, 1987 (30) E.L.T. 641 that the Customs Author .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X