2009 (4) TMI 772

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n them under Section 76 and Rs. 1000/- imposed under Section 77 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appellants are liable to pay service tax for business auxiliary service and there was a delay in payment of service tax during the period from April, 2006 to January, 2007 and hence penalty has been imposed under Section 76 77. The appellants have discharged their liability of service tax with interest .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he appellants in their appeal memorandum. The appellants have made the same submissions before me which were made before the Commissioner (Appeals) also. Their submission is that they could not get details of deductions from the parent company relating to non-fulfilment of target and other charges and hence the delay occurred in payment of service tax and the delay was not intentional. However as .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X