2012 (3) TMI 251

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ioner, before the CESTAT – Held that:- Court is not inclined to interfere with the final order dated 6.04.2011 passed by the CESTAT. It is for the tribunal to consider the rectification application filed by the petitioner, and pass appropriate orders - Petition dismissed. - W.P.No.1379 of 2012 - - - Dated:- 20-2-2012 - MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN, J. For Petitioner : Mr.Hari Radhakrishnan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ication No. E/ROM/28.11, before the Customs, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, could not be taken up for hearing. In the said application, the petitioner had prayed for a rectification in the final order passed by the Customs, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, in Final Order No. 505-506/2011, dated 6.4.2011. In such circumstances, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petiti .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... filed by the petitioner, in Application No. E/ROM/28.11, and pass appropriate orders thereon, on merits and in accordance with law. Hence, this Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. However, as there is no regular sitting of the bench, it would be open to the petitioner to make an appropriate application to the Assistant Registrar of the Customs, Excise Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, South .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X