9911796707
TMI Blog2013 (1) TMI 687X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... bmitted Ext.P6 representation which did not satisfy the requirements of the scheme. It was in those circumstances benefit of the Amnesty Scheme was not given - no fault with the assessing officer in denying claim - writ dismissed. - W.P.(C) NO.30096 OF 2012(J) - - - Dated:- 14-1-2013 - ANTONY DOMINIC, J. PETITIONER BY ADVS.SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON, SRI.P.YADHU KUMAR RESPO ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of Ext.P3 appellate order. It is challenging Ext.P7 modified order the writ petition is filed. 4. Contention raised by the counsel for the petitioner is that in Ext.P5 judgment of the Division Bench, petitioner was given the opportunity to avail of the benefit of Amnesty Scheme and that he applied for the benefit by submitting Ext.P6 request. It is stated that it was without considering that app ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... itted Ext.P6 representation which did not satisfy the requirements of the scheme. It was in those circumstances benefit of the Amnesty Scheme was not given and Ext.P7 modified order was issued. Since the petitioner has not complied with the conditions of the Amnesty Scheme, I am unable to find fault with the assessing officer in having issued Ext.P7. Therefore this writ petition is dismissed. Bu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
