2013 (6) TMI 318

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 294 - MADRAS HIGH COURT] - Held that:- it is evident that no one appeared for the appellant on the date of hearing and the authority has proceeded with the matter and passed the order, that too without giving sufficient reasons regarding pre-deposit of 50% for hearing the appeal on merits. Since the appellant is making grievance about non compliance of the principle of natural justice, we are o .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... abakar, learned counsel appearing for the appellant and Mr. Vikram Ramakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 3. The grievance of the appellant is that no opportunity of personal hearing was given and the representative of the appellant could not appear on 18.1.2013. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that if a fresh date of hearing is given, the representative of the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X