2013 (11) TMI 336

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cted to predeposit a higher amount. However, after considering the submissions of both sides, we are of the view that the appellant should predeposit only 50% of the penalty imposed on him - Stay denied. - Appeal No.: C/466/2011 - - - Dated:- 11-3-2013 - Mr. P.G. Chacko and Mr. B.S.V. Murthy, JJ. For the Appellant: Mr. G.H. Pradyumna, Advocate For the Respondent: Ms. Sabrina Cano, A.R. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... pellant. In those stay applications, this Bench vide Stay Order Nos. 1715 1716/2012 dated 26.9.2012 directed Mr. Fazal Akrami to predeposit 50% of the penalty imposed on him. It is not in dispute that Mr. Fazal Akrami has been found to have abetted the offence committed by the present appellant. The abettor was required to predeposit 50% of the penalty. The main offender can therefore be directe .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X