2003 (1) TMI 684

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he earlier orders dated April 21, 1990 relating to the assessment year 1983-84 and the order dated April 30, 1990 relating to the assessment year 1984-85 have been dismissed. 2.. Vide order dated April 21, 1990 the Tribunal has decided the appeal of the applicant ex parte for the assessment year 1983-84 and vide order dated April 30, 1990, the Tribunal had decided the appeal ex parte relating to .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... not inform the other partner about the date of hearing. A medical certificate and an affidavit was filed. I have heard Sri Piyush Agarwal, learned counsel for the applicant and learned Standing Counsel. The Tribunal vide order dated October 11, 1990, rejected the aforesaid two applications and against the said orders, the present revisions have been filed. 3.. I have heard Sri Piyush Agarwal, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... portunity of hearing and recall ex parte orders. 5.. In my opinion, Tribunal was not justified in rejecting the restoration applications. On the facts and circumstances, restoration applications are allowed. 6.. For the reasons above, revisions are allowed. Restoration application No. 8 of 1990 in appeal No. 16 of 1987 and Restoration application No. 9 of 1990 in appeal No. 16 of 1987 are allo .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X