Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2007 (6) TMI 491

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... No. 6 of 2007, with which the petitioner is aggrieved. It is the apprehension of the writ petitioner that the provisions of this Act which were brought into force in terms of notification dated March 30, 2007 published by the second respondent will be an act adverse and in fact detrimental to the industrial and business activity of the petitioner and having regard to the background leading to this legislation, the petitioner has approached this court questioning the constitutional validity of the Act as amended in Amendment Act 6 of 2007 insofar as it relates to the inclusion of the denatured spirit at serial No. 4 of the Fourth Schedule to the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, contending that inclusion of denatured anhydrous alcohol .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... the State to regulate the distribution of the denatured spirit manufactured by the writ petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the denatured spirit is essentially used as industrial alcohol which cannot be subject-matter for legislation for levy of tax or regulation by the State Government; that the denatured spirit which was being manufactured and sold by the writ petitioner found a new customer when it was found that it can be used for producing alternative fuel and as a part of it, in the manufacture of five per cent ethanol based petroleum product, which perhaps has better efficiency or is more conducive to environmental protection and as such there was great demand from this sector for supply of denatured spirit .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nufacture and trade of denatured spirit by the petitioner and like persons, has now resorted to the indirect method of levying tax at an unreasonably high rate under the provisions of the Act, to stifle or control the trade in denatured spirit in an indirect way and employing the VAT Act for that purpose is nothing but a colourable exercise of the legislative power. It is submitted that the present legislation is a clear case of an instance of colourable exercise of legislative power and therefore the provision is in fact and in reality an attempt to legislate the subjectmatter beyond the competence of State Legislature and accordingly unconstitutional. It is also the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the attempt is .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... icularly, to maintain the contractual obligation with the buyers of denatured spirit. If the levy of tax in respect of any transaction is at a lesser rate, say, two per cent, three per cent, or five per cent it cannot be disputed as one not within the legislative competence. It is because the rate of tax becomes a little higher or so high so as to make it unprofitable for the petitioner to carry on its trade, the petitioner is complaining that it is unconstitutional being an instance piece of colourable exercise of legislative power. Though Sri Raghavan, learned Senior Counsel would submit that when once it is contended that the legislation itself is an instance of colourable exercise of legislative power, it cannot make any differenc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hin the legislative competence and in the instant case the levy of tax being on the transaction of sale which is undisputedly within the legislative competence of the State and it is only the effect of levy of tax that is sought to be used to attribute either lack of legislative competence or unconstitutionality through the device of colourable exercise of power, I am unable to accept the argument that the provision should be struck down as unconstitutional. The provision being a direct provision for levy of tax in respect of sale transaction, etc., it cannot be held either as though it is one beyond the legislative competence or unconstitutional. In the light of the above position, the provision cannot be held to be discriminatory just .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates