9911796707
TMI Blog2014 (4) TMI 1037X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng the various parties involved on the same issue. Hence, we order waiver of the requirement of pre-deposit of dues arising from the impugned orders for admission of the appeals and stay collection of such dues during the pendency of the appeals - Stay granted. - ST/00699 to 00702/2011 - MISC. ORDER No. 42453-42456/2013 - Dated:- 9-10-2013 - Shri Pradip Kumar Das and Shri Mathew John, JJ. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... mpugned order, adjudicating two SCNs, is Rs. 2,15,62,637/-. In the case of M/s. Dishnet Wireless Ltd., the period involved in the impugned order, adjudicating two SCNs, is Mar. 09 to Dec. 10 and the amount involved is Rs.34,26,95,835/-. Further, there are fines and penalties involved. Presently, stay petition for waiver of pre-deposit of dues for admission of appeal is being heard. 2. This issu ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d pre-deposit of part of the amount confirmed against that party. This order was also stayed by the Bombay High Court vide order dated 02.07.2013 in Appeal No. C/88/2013 along with orders in Central Excise Appeal No. 73/2012 and 119 of 2012 filed by M/s. Bharati Airtel Ltd., before Bombay High Court. Thus, the position is that no part of credit taken by any assessee similarly placed and who has co ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... n doubted by another Bench of the Hon. Apex Court and the matter stands referred to a larger bench of the Apex Court in the case of Ramala Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. Vs CCE, Meerut - 2010 (260) ELT 321 (SC). 4. We note that as on date no other company providing similar services has been made to pre-deposit any money on this issue for hearing their appeal. Therefore, we consider it proper to main ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
