9911796707
TMI Blog2012 (12) TMI 948X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ned orders by concurring with the reasoning contained therein we are inclined to allow this appeal in part and while modifying the impugned order dated 30-3-2012, extend the period originally granted by the Tribunal in order dated 18-1-2012 by further period of three months to be counted from the date of this order for deposit of ₹ 50 lakhs either in the Tribunal or with the Department as th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ted 30-3-2012 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi (hereinafter for short called the Tribunal ) in Appeal Nos. 2288 to 2291 of 2010. 3. By the impugned order, the Tribunal was pleased to dismiss the appeal filed by the assessee for non-compliance of order dated 18-1-2012 passed by the Tribunal under Section 35F of the Act, by which the appellant (assessee ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the aforesaid discussion, the application (I.A. No. 01) is allowed. The delay in filing the present appeal is hereby condoned. 7. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the records of the case and having regard to the nature of controversy involved in this appeal on merits coupled with the fact that the counsel appearing for the appellant in alternative and as a last re ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment as the case may be. In case if the appellant ensure compliance of order dated 18-1-2012 within three months from today by depositing the required amount of ₹ 50 lakhs and report the compliance report before the Tribunal as directed, then we request the Tribunal to decide the appeal filed by the assessee being Central Excise Nos. 228 to 2291 of 2010 on its merits in accordance with law. ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
