Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2015 (4) TMI 249

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t judgment, if need arises. - CWP No.7172 of 2010, CWP No.1852 of 2010, CWP No.4731 of 2010, CWP No.8082 of 2010, CWP No.8608 of 2010,CWP No.769 of 2011 - - - Dated:- 5-8-2014 - Mr. Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice and Mr. Tarlok Singh Chauhan, JJ. For the Appellant : M/s. K.L. Goyal, Sr. Advocate with Sandeep Goyal and Mr. Rishab Singla, Adv. Aditya Bhattacharya, Jyotsna Rewal Dua, K.D. Sood, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Rahul Mahajan, N.K. Sood, Ajay Vaidya, S.R.Sharma, Sunil Chaudhary, Deepak Kaushal, Amar Deep Singh, Anu Tuli Azta with S.V. Sharma, Advocate, Neeraj Gupta, Onkar Jairath, V.B.Verma, Advocate with B.K. Thakur, Yadvinder Sharma with Avinash Jaryal, Rupinder Singh, Tara Singh Chauhan, N.S. Chandel, Anup Rattan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... al, Sunil Sharma, L.N. Sharma, Lalit Kumar Sehgal, O.P.Negi, Vivek Darhel, Tarunjeet Singh Bhogal, Ravi Tanta, Adarsh Sharma Narender Sharma-1, Prem Lata Negi, Mukesh Thakur, Satyen Vaidya, Sushant Kaprate, Rakesh Thakur with Munish Thakur, Naveen Awasthi, B.S.Ranjan, Sunil Chauhan, Rupinder Singh, Ahhey Gupta, Neel Kamal Sood, Ranjna Parmar, S.C. Sharma, Shyam Singh Chauhan, Vinod Chauhan, Vishal Panwar, Shriyek Sharda, Naveen Kumar Dass, Adamya Rathore, Kiran Lata Sharma, Amit Kumar Dhumal, Rajesh Kashyap, Dinesh Nath Bhanot, Chander Shekhar Verma, Neeraj Sharma, Janesh Gupta, Neeraj Gupta, Priyanka Verma, Harish Sharma, Ashish Azad, Shreya Chauhan, Deepak Kaushal, Amar Deep Singh, Ashwani Kaundal, D.S. Kaisth, Rahul Mahajan, Archana Dutt .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Nishant Thakur, Naresh K. Gupta, Raj Negi, Mahika Verma, Sumeet Raj Sharma, Ritu Raj Sharma, M.S. Kanwar, Naresh K. Tomar, Dinesh Bhanot, Pankaj Sharma, Sandeep Chauhan, Basant Pal Thakur, V. Dharel, Surya Deep Thakur, Jagat Pal, B.M. Chauhan, Sanjay Sharma, Sanjay Ghandi, Inder Dutt, Rajesh Kashyap, Kamlender Bhardwaj, Jagdish Thakur, Karan Singh Kanwar, Rajinder Singh Chandel, Yogesh K. Chandel, H.C. Sharma, A.K. Bansal, Bhim Raj Sharma, Ranjana Parmar, Vayur Gautam, Harmit Singh, Dheeraj Kanwar, S.K. Jain, Saurabh Gautam, Anish Banshtu, Ajay Mohan Goel, Sunil Mohan Goel, Rakesh Sharma, Megha Gupta, Suneet Goel, Arvind Sharma, Vikas Raj, Neeraj Maniktala, Seema Maniktala, Rajiv Agnihotri, Ajay Kumar (Senior Advocate), Gautam Sood, Sumit S .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r dated 20.7.2010, passed in CWP 1852 of 2010, relating to Entry Tax (Goods) referred to supra hereinbelow: Final hearing was deferred since we find that very similar issue is pending before the Supreme Court. The constitutional validity of the Himachal Pradesh Tax on Entry of Goods into Local Area Act, 2010 is under challenge. We find that several similar matters are pending before the Supreme Court and hence we feel it only appropriate to defer the final hearing. In SLP (c) No. 14454-14778/2008, State of Orrisa others versus M/s Reliance Industries Ltd. ors, the Supreme Court has passed an interim order on 3.2.2010 to the effect that the assessee will pay 1/3rd of the liability as assessed under the Act. There will henc .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... cal issues and matters were adjourned till 12th August, 2013, in terms of order dated 12th June, 2013, passed by this Court. 5. CWP No. 7172 of 2010 was treaded as lead case by this Court in terms of order dated 13th August, 2013, whereby writ petitions were admitted to hearing and interim orders supra were made absolute. 6. In the given circumstances, we deem it proper to dispose of these writ petitions by providing that all the writ petitions shall abide by the judgment of the apex Court read with the interim orders, referred to above. It is made clear that the writ petitioners/writ respondents are at liberty to lay motion in terms of the apex Court judgment, if need arises. 7. Accordingly, all the writ petitions alongwith pendin .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates