2015 (10) TMI 1136

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nd Haryana in the case of Vee Kay Enterprises vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, reported in [2011 (3) TMI 133 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT],the said decision of the Larger Bench of the Tribunal [2006 (10) TMI 146 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI [LB]] does not hold the field any more. - Rectification denied. - Application No. E/ROM/97607, 97608/14-MUM, Appeal No. E/880, 881/08-MUM - - - Dated:- 20-4-2015 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... and 23/3/2015 at the request of applicants. Today, again there is request for adjournment. However it is further submitted that if adjournment is not possible ROM may be decided on the grounds given by in the application. 3. We find that as per Central Excise law no more than three adjournment can be given to a party even for main appeal. Already four chances have been given to the applicant an .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X