9911796707
TMI Blog2016 (3) TMI 597X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... puting deduction u/s.10A of the Act. See CIT vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd [2011 (8) TMI 782 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ] - ITA No.557/2015 - - - Dated:- 1-3-2016 - JAYANT PATEL AND B V NAGARATHNA, JJ For the Petitioner : Sri E I Sanmathi, Adv For the Respondent : Ms Jinitha Chatterjee for Sri S Parthasarathi, Adv JUDGEMENT PER : JAYANT PATEL : The Appellants-Revenue have preferred thi ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... pending before the Hon ble Supreme Court ? 2. We have heard Sri E.I.Sanmathi, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants-revenue and Ms.Jinitha Chatterjee for Sri S.Parthasarathi, who has appeared upon an advance copy on behalf of the respondent. She further states that vakalathnama will be filed within a week. 3. We may record that while dealing with the subject relating to the aforesa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ng the matter has relied upon a decision of this Court in case of CIT vs. Tata Elxsi Ltd. reported in 349 ITR 98 [KAR]. As such, when the Tribunal has followed the decision of this Court, it cannot be said that the question of law would arise for determination, as sought to be canvassed. However, learned Counsel for the appellants contended that the decision of this Court in case of Tata Elxsi Ltd ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
