2006 (5) TMI 48

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... n again and again is therefore rejected - 2674/2002 - Misc. Order No. 418/2006-EX(PB) - Dated:- 16-5-2006 - [Order per : K.C. Mamgain, Member (T)]. - This application for restoration of appeal has been filed on the ground that vide Final Order No. 284/2003- NB(C), dated 29-5-2003, the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of order dated 16-1-2003. The applicants thereafter filed three applic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r earlier applications for restoration of appeal were rejected. Therefore, the present application may also be rejected. 3. On considering the submissions made by both the sides, we find that the Appeal No. 2694 of 2002 was filed by the applicants against the Order-in- Original No. 27/Comm/MI/2002, dated 3-9-2002 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Meerut-I in which duty of Rs. 5,46, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... sit the amount within 15 days and move application for restoration of the appeal. The applicant has also not complied with this and thus the order became final. Thereafter, the applicants without depositing the amount, moved application for restoration of the appeal on 24-7-2003. They again filed an application for restoration of the appeal on 14th September, 2005 without depositing any amount whi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X