2008 (1) TMI 40

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... BER (TECHNICAL) Per: Mrs. Archana Wadhwa, Member (Judicial) After hearing both sides, we find that the dispute relates to the assessable value of the aerated water manufactured by the appellant and supplied to M/s Surat Bottling Company under contract. It is seen that there was earlier dispute about the price list which was held in favour of the appellant by the Commissioner (Appeals)' .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ct price. The said price stands raised by the Commissioner (Appeals) on the ground that the advertising expenses incurred by M/s Surat Bottling Co. are required to be added in the assessable value in as much as both are the franchisee of the same holding company M/s Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. and as such are related. 3. We find that the goods have been supplied under a contract pric .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X