2016 (10) TMI 112

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... he exemption u/r 4, so, the appellants were not liable to pay service tax as there was no restriction during the relevant time reported in [2007 (12) TMI 47 - CESTAT, CHENNAI] - Appellant seeks to withdraw the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, as the monetary limit relating to the matter is less than ₹ 15,00,000/- and want the liberty to be granted to revive the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... hin a period of twelve weeks from today. - Appeal dismissed as withdrawn - Appeal No. 2136 of 2010 - - - Dated:- 25-1-2016 - Mr. M. Jaichandren and Mrs. S. Vimala, JJ. ORDER The learned counsels appearing for the Appellant/Department had submitted that they may be permitted by this Court to withdraw the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, in view of the instructions issued, in F. No. .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... r the decision of this Court, in the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, are left open to be considered and decided in appropriate cases, in accordance with law. It is also made clear that it would be open to the Appellant/Department to revive the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal, if it is found that it had been withdrawn, inadvertently, even though it falls under the exceptions mentioned in the relevan .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X