TMI Blog2016 (11) TMI 615X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d by the petitioner’s counsel, we are of the considered view that no deposit need be made by the petitioner and it is a fit case where direction for deletion of the requirement of pre-deposit would support in the ends of justice. Accordingly, we so direct. The writ application is disposed of with direction to the Tribunal to consider the Appeal on its own merit without insisting on any further pre ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rder as a condition precedent to entertaining the appeal. 3. Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner files an additional affidavit dated 10-2-2016, copy of which has been served on the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the Central Excise, Customs and Service Tax Department. In the said affidavit, he has stated in Paragraphs-3 and 5, which is as follows : 3. That during th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... th and marked as Annexure No. 11 and 12 respectively. 4. Considering the financial stringency being faced by the petitioner and the fact that an amount of ₹ 3,60,000/- has been offered by way of security, which on maturity would amount to more than ₹ 5,00,000/- as claimed by the petitioner s counsel, we are of the considered view that no deposit need be made by the petitioner and i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|