2016 (11) TMI 908

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... Supreme Court that order of the higher appellate authorities is binding on the subordinate authority, which under any circumstances cannot be defied - the case relates to the revocation of the CHA License and due to delay CHA is out of the job due to delay on the part of the Revenue. We, therefore, direct the adjudicating authority to restore the CHA License subject to the de novo adjudication or .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ginal adjudicating authority for passing a fresh order. In the order, this Tribunal has explicitly directed the adjudicating authority for passing a de novo adjudication within three months from the receipt of this order. However, even after passing of eight months the adjudicating authority has not taken any action for de novo proceedings. He submits that the issue is related to revocation of CHA .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... his order. We find that the adjudicating authority neither completed the de novo adjudication nor even bother to approach this Tribunal if there is any genuine difficulty in passing de novo adjudication order within the stipulated time period of three months. The attitude of the adjudicating authority is very casual and careless, as he has defied the direction given by this Tribunal. It is a settl .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X