9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (4) TMI 73X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d in business of purchasing and selling 'air gun' and 'air pistol', which are used as a game to fix target for recreation. Whether 'air gun' and 'air pistol' are to be taxed under Entry 124 of Schedule-II 'toys including electronic toys', or is to be taxed as 'arms and ammunition' vide Entry 2 of Schedule IV, is the question posed for consideration. An application under Section 59 was moved seeking Commissioner's opinion. The Commissioner, Commercial Tax, vide his order dated 20.8.2013 opined that 'air gun' and 'air pistol' is to be taxed as 'arms and ammunition'. Tribunal rejected appeal filed against it. Thus aggrieved, assessee has preferred this revision and fol ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... the facts and circumstances of the case the learned Additional Revising Authority was justified in holding that the Air Guns are covered by the Notifications regarding Arms and Ammunition? 2. The reference is being treated as a revision in view of the amendment in the law. 3. Air Guns is weapon in which compressed air is used for propelling a lead pellet, the velocity of the pellet depends upon the air pressure released from the compressor chamber of the gun. Although most of the air gun are not lethal, in the sense that projectiles fired through them is not capable of killing human being, yet it is capable of inflicting bodily injuries. In the case of Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. vs. M/s Madan Sons, Dehradun, 1978 UPTC 676 t ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... laced reliance upon a judgment of Kerala High Court in Deputy Commissioner of Sales Tax v. K. Mohammed, 1989 (74) STC 2010. A Division Bench had occasion to examine similar situation occurring in the Kerala General Sales Tax Act. Decision of this Court in M/s Agarwal Brothers, Faizabad (supra) was not followed for the reasons set out in para 6, which is reproduced:- 6. The next decision referred to by the Government Pleader is Agarwal Brothers v. Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. [1980] 45 STC 318 (All.). After referring to the decision reported in Commissioner of Sales Tax, U.P. v. Madan Sons [1979] 43 STC 207 (All.), wherein it has been held : The word 'arm' is not a term of art and has to be understood in its popular sens ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... usion. All implements which can inflict injury cannot be characterised as arms within the meaning of the expression contained in the entry. It is well settled that in order to ascertain the correct meaning of a fiscal entry, reference to a dictionary is apt to be somewhat delusive guide as it gives all the different shades of meaning. [See Collector of Central Excise, Kanpur v. Krishna Carbon Paper Company JT 1988 (4) SC 762.] Their Lordships also observed in the said judgment that it is a well-settled principle of construction, as mentioned before, that where the word has a scientific or technical meaning and also an ordinary meaning according to common parlance, it is in the latter sense that in a taxing statute the word must be held to h ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ment in M/s Agarwal Brothers Faizabad (supra), the Division Bench, while answering reference, agreed with the view expressed by Kerala High Court. On the strength of these decisions, it is contended before this Court that 'arms and ammunition' as taxing entry would not be attracted and that view taken in M/s Agarwal Brothers Faizabad (supra) does not lay down correct law. 6. Learned Standing Counsel, on the other hand, submits that the judgment of this Court in M/s Agarwal Brothers Faizabad (supra) has consistently been followed for a period of last more than 38 years, and if the applicant's argument is found to have substance, then the question be referred to a Larger Bench. 7. In the absence of a definition in the Act, & ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
