TMI Blog2012 (6) TMI 861X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... order confirming penalty u/s 271 (1)(c) of the Act regarding Assessment Year 2008-09. 2. The main grievance of the assessee is that CIT (A) has dismissed his appeal without adverting to facts and nature of the grounds raised, that too, by a totally non-speaking order. 3. As we see from ld CIT (A) order whose operative part reads as under: In the grounds of appeal as above it has been si ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... of as provided u/s 250(6) of the Act. 4. Although nobody has turned up on assessee s behalf, but we have heard ld DR. The order of CIT (A) is too cryptic. Apart from being non-speaking order, it nowhere states points for determination, decision thereon with reasons in support as required under the provisions of the Act. 5. Therefore, we have no hesitation in setting aside the CIT (A) s order ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|