Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

1970 (12) TMI 18

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... public limited company. The assessment year is 1959-60, the relevant accounting period being the year ending 31st August, 1958. The assessee claimed a deduction of Rs. 250 which was paid by it on account of professional tax. Both the Income-tax Officer and the Appellate Assistant Commissioner disallowed this amount in view of the provisions of section 10(4) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 (hereinafter called " the Act "). The Appellate Tribunal, however, held it to be an allowable deduction, because the assessee had to pay this tax in order to carry on its business. This finding was given relying on the decision of the Allahabad High Court in Simbholi Sugar Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-tax. The Commissioner of Income-tax then mad .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 0(2)(xv) and was allowable as a deduction in the relevant assessment. The position taken by the revenue, on the other hand, was that the assessee could not claim this deduction in view of the provisions of section 10(4) of the Act, the relevant part of which is : " Nothing in clause (ix) or clause (xv) of sub-section (2) shall be deemed to authorise the allowance of any sum paid on account of any cess, rate or tax levied on the profits or gains of any business, profession or vocation or assessed at a proportion of or otherwise on the basis of any such profits or gains....." Their case was that since ths tax was levied on the profits or gains of the assessee's business or in any case assessed at a proportion of or otherwise on the basi .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... v. King and Partridge. There the question for consideration was whether the profession tax paid under section 111 of the Madras City Municipal Act should be allowed as a proper deduction from, the taxable income " as an expenditure incurred solely for the purpose of the profession " of the assessee within the meaning of section 11 of the Act. The Commissioner of Income-tax was of the opinion that the deduction claimed was not an allowable item. While giving their opinion on this question, the learned Judges observed : " The answer to the question put to us depends in our opinion upon the nature of the profession tax levied by the municipality. If the profession tax is a contribution from the income of the assessee to the municipalities i .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ent is made in the course of, or arises out of, or is connected with the trade, or is made out of the profits of the trade. It must be made for the purpose of earning the profits.' Following that view, we consider that the payment of profession tax does not fall within section 11. " In this view of the matter, it is needless to decide the other question whether the profession tax is levied on the profits or gains of any business or assessed at a proportion of or otherwise on the basis of such profits or gains as centended by the revenue ; or it is charged on the total receipts during an assessment year of an assessee irrespective of the fact whether it made any profits or not, as argued by the learned counsel for the assessee. I would .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates