9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (9) TMI 992X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e that they have complied with the pre-deposit order - application for restoration of appeal is dismissed. - ST/ROA/40169/2016 in ST/40944/2014 - MISC ORDER No. 40248/2017 - Dated:- 3-7-2017 - Smt. Sulekha Beevi C.S., Member (Judicial) and Shri Madhu Mohan Damodhar, Member (Technical) Shri K. G. Srinivasan, For the appellant Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, JC (AR), For the respondent ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... e appellant has a good case on merits and he is a poor labourer and could not comply with the pre-deposit order only due to financial hardships met by him. 3. Against this, Ld. AR, Shri K. Veerabhadra Reddy, JC, strongly opposes the application for restoration of appeal. He submitted that after passing the pre-deposit order directing the appellant to pre-deposit an amount or ₹ 2,00,000/ ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rds as well as the submissions made by both sides, we find that the Tribunal had directed the appellant to pre-deposit ₹ 2,00,000/- and report compliance on or before 27.08.2015. As rightly pointed out by the Ld. AR, the appellant has been given further chances to make pre-deposit on 21.09.2015 as well as on 19.10.2015, on which dates the Tribunal had adjourned the matter. Thereafter, due ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
