9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (11) TMI 346X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to service tax under the Finance Act, 1994? Held that: - CBEC has issued a Circular No. 89/7/2006-S.T., dated 18-12-2006 clarifies that wherever the charges collected by any sovereign public authority for carrying out any statutory function, the same is not liable to levy of service tax subject to three conditions - CESTAT in the case of Dy. Commissioner of Police & Others v. CCE, Jaipur & Othe ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... rya, Member (T) Shri Z.U. Alvi, Advocate, for the Appellant. Ms. Neha Garg, DR, for the Respondent. ORDER [Order per : Ashok K. Arya, Member (T)]. - Dy. Inspector General of Police is in appeal against the Order-in-Original No. 32-33/2013, dated 26-9-2013 passed by Commissioner, Central Excise Service Tax, Bhopal whereunder demand of service tax of ₹ 1,33,19,821/- alon ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... hri Z.U. Alvi and Revenue has been represented by ld. AR, Dr. Neha Garg. 4. Both the sides have been heard. After perusal of the facts on record and submissions of both sides, we are of the view that the appellant is performing statutory duties and the amount so collected is being deposited in the Govt. treasury. CBEC has issued a Circular No. 89/7/2006-S.T., dated 18-12-2006 clarifying that wh ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... te Government cannot be considered to be a person engaged in the business of running security services. The CESTAT in the said decision has held that the activity undertaken by the police is not covered by the definition of security agency under Section 64(94) of the Finance Act, 1994. 4.2 It is on record that the appellant is depositing the money collected on account of the subject services in ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
