9911796707
TMI Blog2017 (11) TMI 528X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... to 31970 of 2015 challenging the assessment orders for the years 2006-07 to 2008-09, as could be seen from the typed-set of papers filed in support of this Writ Petition - Held that: - the first respondent was not justified in refusing to extend the order of stay, though the interest of the Revenue is fully safeguarded, that is to say, 50% of the disputed tax and the balance 50% was secured by wa ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... isposal. 3. The petitioner, being aggrieved by the order of assessment, under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as TNVAT Act ) dated 30.10.2015 for the assessment year 2009-10, has preferred an Appeal before the first respondent/Joint Commissioner (CT) Appeals, Chennai. The Appeal has been taken on file on 07.03.2016 in A.P.16/16, and as a pre-c ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ions in W.P.Nos.31968 to 31970 of 2015 challenging the assessment orders for the years 2006-07 to 2008-09, as could be seen from the typed-set of papers filed in support of this Writ Petition. The Writ Petitions pertains to reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) in respect of transfer of goods in Works Contract/Special Economic Zones (SEZs). With regard to the remaining issue, the petitioner was direc ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... espondent is directed to consider and dispose of the Appeal Petition on merits and in accordance with law. Till the Appeal is heard and disposed of, the order of Interim Stay shall continue to operate. The petitioner shall keep the bank guarantee alive till the disposal of the appeal. 5. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
