9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (1) TMI 759X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... other relevant record was produced. A perusal of the said report shows that all the charges have been proved against respondent No.6 - the writ petition is disposed of as infructuous as after the charges have been proved against respondent No.6, further disciplinary action is being taken against him in accordance with the relevant rules. - CWP No.11842 of 2016 - - - Dated:- 20-12-2017 - MR. AJAY KUMAR MITTAL AND MR. AMIT RAWAL, JJ. For The Petitioner : Mr.Pankaj Midha, Advocate for the petitioner Mr.Pankaj Gupta, Addl. A.G. Punjab For The Respondent : Mr. Piyush Kant Jain, Advocate ORDER Ajay Kumar Mittal, J. 1. Prayer in this petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for a direction to ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... aba to the shop of the petitioner to collect the amount of bribe. Accordingly, the petitioner paid ₹ 10000/- to the Excise Inspector who came at the behest of respondent No.6. Respondent No.6 inspected the business premises on 14.7.2015 and started threatening him by using un-parliamentary language and pressurized him to pay Rs. 5 lacs as bribe money for finalization of assessment cases. Respondent No.6 also asked the petitioner to deposit Rs. 2 lacs for the inspection. Since the petitioner did not make payment of Rs. 5 lacs as bribe money, respondent No.6 started harassing the petitioner by serving notices under Section 29 of the Act read with Rule 47 of the Punjab VAT Rules, 2005 and under Section 9(2) of the Central Sales Tax Ac ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y. Hence the instant petition by the petitioner. 3. Separate written statements have been filed by the official respondents as well as respondent No.6 controverting the averments made in the petition. Replication has also been filed by the petitioner to the written statements reiterating the averments made in the petition. 4. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. On 7.9.2017, it was recorded by this Court that in order to verify the credentials and test the bonafides of the petitioner, a demand draft amounting to Rs. 5 lacs in favour of Registrar General of this Court be produced by him so that in case, the averments or allegations made against respondent No.6 are found to be incorrect, the same shall be forfeited on a ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
