9911796707
TMI Blog2018 (4) TMI 1193X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ist in the case of M/s. Vedanta Limited Versus Commissioner of Customs, Tuticorin [2018 (1) TMI 1024 - CESTAT CHENNAI], where it was held that When the right of the appellant for cross-examination has been taken away by the said decision of the adjudicating authority, merely because the same is issued in the form of a letter and not clothed as an order, it cannot be said that the said letter / dec ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... d to M/s. Vedanta Ltd. in connection with alleged evasion of Customs duty by misuse of advance licence / advance authorization scheme. The Ld. Advocate further submits that M/s. Vedanta Ltd. had also filed an appeal against the same letter dt. 29.9.2017 in Appeal No. C/42518/2017 which was disposed of by the Tribunal by Final Order No.40084/2018 dt. 10.01.2018 taking note of the appeal against th ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... amination of witnesses sought for by the appellant. 12. The next point to be considered is regarding the rejection of request for supply of documents. On perusal of records, we find that the appellant has not requested for any particular document. They filed an RTI application and obtained copies of letters dated 13.9.2014 and 9.1.2015. It is their case that the entire chain of corresponden ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... t is not put to notice as to what is the document that the appellant seeks to obtain and only a vague request to furnish the entire chain of correspondence between Customs and Excise authorities is made, such request cannot be entertained or allowed. For these reasons, we reject the request of the appellant to direct the respondent to furnish document to them. 13. In the result, the appeal i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
