2018 (4) TMI 1652

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... nce has been rejected on the ground that there were some cases of arrear against the applicant and even penalty under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act were imposed on the applicant during the year 2012-13 which were even paid by the applicant. This fact has not been denied by the applicant also in their Revision applications and they have merely stated that these cases arose due to interpret .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... ntex Ltd., Banswara (hereinafter referred to as the applicant) against the Order-in-Appeal Nos. 133-136 (SLM) CE/JPR/2015, dated 9-3-2015, passed by the Commissioner of Customs Central Excise (Appeals), Jaipur whereby applicant s appeals have been rejected. 2. The Revision applications have been filed mainly on the ground that as per C.B.E. C. Circular No. 828/5/2006-CX, dated 20-4-2006, 80 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e Central Excise Act were imposed on the applicant during the year 2012-13 which were even paid by the applicant. This fact has not been denied by the applicant also in their Revision applications and they have merely stated that these cases arose due to interpretational dispute only. The Government believes that while each dispute has interpretational angle, the truth in the matter is that the ap .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X