Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram

TMI Blog

Home

2019 (3) TMI 622

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... being nullified later is not particularly appealing to a judicial institution. Should it be held otherwise, there is no detriment to Revenue as the proceedings would then be reinstated. Considering the criticality of competence to issue show cause notice, the ends of justice will be appropriately met if the impugned order is set aside and the matter remanded back to the adjudicating authority to be decided afresh after the question of jurisdiction of officers of Directorate of Revenue Intelligence to issue notice for recovery of duty is settled - appeal allowed by way of remand. - APPEAL NOS: C/1126 to 1128/2009 - A/85219-85221/2019 - Dated:- 25-1-2019 - Shri C J Mathew, Member (Technical) And Dr Suvendu Kumar Pati, Member (Judicial) .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... at length and have gone through the material available on record. The constitutionality of retrospective validation of competence to issue notice was challenged in different High Courts and, in the light of the decision of the Hon ble High Court of Delhi in Mangali Impex v. Union of India [2016 (335) ELT 605 (Del)], stayed subsequently by the Hon ble Supreme Court, and noting the diverging decisions of various High Courts, the Hyderabad bench of this Tribunal, while disposing off the appeal in Alumeco India Extrusion Ltd v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Customs Service Tax, Hyderabad-I [2010 (249) ELT 577 (Tri.Bang.)], has considered it appropriate not to dispose off matters in which this has been agitated. Subsequent decisions of t .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... in Mangali Impex Ltd., (supra); and (2) the judgment of a Division Bench of the Punjab Haryana High Court in Rajinder Arora and Others v. Union of India and Others [2016 (339) E.L.T. 370 (P H)]. In Mangali Impex Ltd., (supra), the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court set aside even the show cause notices, despite the fact that the show cause notices had already culminated in orders of finality. In Rajinder Arora and Others v. Union of India and others (1 supra), a Division Bench of the Punjab Haryana High Court also dealt with a case where the show cause notice had culminated in a order of adjudication, but it was the subject matter of an appeal before the Tribunal. The Punjab Haryana High Court held that in the light of the deci .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... e, are also to be deemed as non est. Therefore, the Commissionerates of Excise throughout the country can today be flooded with applications for refund of the duty paid in pursuance of the orders of adjudication passed on the basis of such show cause notices. The theory of nullity and voidity cannot be extended to such an extent as to lead to such disastrous consequences. 15. There is also one more aspect. It is not the case of the petitioner that they challenged either the impugned show cause notice or the Order-in-Original at the relevant point of time on the ground that the show cause notice was issued by a person not assigned the role of a proper officer. The petitioner had challenged the show cause notice and the order of adjudic .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

 

 

 

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates