9911796707
TMI Blog2019 (4) TMI 573X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... withdrawal with liberty as aforesaid. This Court is of the considered opinion that once the apex Court has not interfered with the Show Cause Notice dated 8/11/2011 and 4/7/2014 and has permitted the petitioner to avail the remedies under the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the question of interference with the Show Cause Notices, by this Court does not arise. - W P No. 791/2019 - - - ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ous works to the petitioner Company. The petitioner Company was incorporated in the name of M/s. Zoom Connect Services Assam Private Ltd., on 13/6/2008 and a tender was issued in 2008 by AMTRON. The petitioner Company participated in the tender process and the dispute arose only when a notice was issued under the Income Tax Act, 1961 [226 (3)] informing the respondent No.3 - M/s. Assam Electronics ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... y the apex Court in the case of Sarguja Transport Services Vs. State Transport appellate Tribunal, Madhya Pradesh reported in (1987) 1 SCC 5 , as earlier Writ Petition was dismissed and as no liberty was granted while the order of withdrawal in respect of first Writ Petition was passed. The petitioner Company, during the pendency of the Writ Petition ie., W.P.No. 183/2014, has preferred a Review ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X ..... ed by the apex Court reads as under : Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for liberty to withdraw the Writ Petition as also the Special Leave Petition and instead avail of his remedies under the provisions of the Income Tax Act. Liberty as prayed is granted. The Writ Petitions as also the Special Leave Petition are accordingly closed on withdrawal with liberty as aforesaid. This Court i ..... X X X X Extracts X X X X X X X X Extracts X X X X
|
