2019 (4) TMI 880

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... so given the benefit of regularization. The learned Single Judge was, therefore, justified in quashing the impugned order dated 07 September, 2012 and issuing a Mandamus for regularization of service. The appellants have not made out a case for interference in the order passed by the learned Single Judge - intra-Court appeal dismissed. - W.A.[MD]No.1657 of 2018 .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... t was on temporary basis. There was a break in his service in the year 1982. He was re-appointed as Office Assistant by proceedings dated 08 November, 1982. The respondent was given special grade on completion of 20 years. The respondent, on attaining the age of superannuation, retired on 30 June, 2009. He was not given pension, as his service was not regularized. The request made by the responden .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... found that even others who were not sponsored by the Employment Exchange were also given the benefit of regularization. The learned Single Judge was, therefore, justified in quashing the impugned order dated 07 September, 2012 and issuing a Mandamus for regularization of service. We are, therefore, of the view that the appellants have not made out a case for interference in the order passed by the .....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

→ Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X